Merger or Acquisition
Understanding the true state of IT before a deal closes. Technology risk that isn't quantified before completion becomes a cost after it.
A structured, board-grade IT assessment that delivers a risk register with named owners, a prioritised remediation roadmap, and no assumptions. A governance document built for action.
Most IT due diligence stops at the report. Risks are catalogued and ratings are applied, then a document is handed over and the engagement ends.
What's missing is ownership. Who is responsible for addressing what's been found, to what standard, and by when? Without a clear accountability structure, a risk register is a liability in itself, evidence that the problem was known and nothing was done.
Bushey's IT Due Diligence & Risk Assessment doesn't produce a report and walk away. Every finding is assigned a named owner, a remediation priority, and a governance path. The output is structured for action, not filing.
This assessment is commissioned when visibility gaps carry material risk, financial, regulatory, or operational.
Understanding the true state of IT before a deal closes. Technology risk that isn't quantified before completion becomes a cost after it.
When the board or audit committee has formally requested assurance on the organisation's technology risk posture and governance maturity.
Assessments required by regulators, industry standards (Essential 8, ISO 27001, APRA CPS 234), or contractual obligations with enterprise clients.
Establishing an honest baseline before committing to a major technology programme. Avoidable risk is far cheaper to identify before transformation begins.
Assessing dependency exposure and transition risk when exiting a key technology vendor or bringing in a new strategic supplier relationship.
Following a cybersecurity incident, service failure, or near-miss. Understanding systemic vulnerabilities before remediation investment is committed.
Each domain is assessed independently and cross-referenced. Findings in one area frequently expose exposure in another, the risk picture is only complete when viewed as a whole.
Physical, virtual, and cloud assets. Resilience design, single points of failure, lifecycle status, and capacity adequacy.
Vulnerability exposure, access controls, endpoint protection, network security, incident response capability, and threat detection maturity.
Application portfolio health, licensing compliance, unsupported or end-of-life software, shadow IT, and integration dependency mapping.
Data classification, quality, lineage, retention practices, backup integrity, and exposure to privacy regulatory obligations.
Team structure, skills coverage, key-person dependency, documentation practices, and the operational readiness of IT to support business continuity.
Vendor concentration risk, contract terms and exit clauses, SLA performance history, and undisclosed dependencies on third-party capabilities.
Gaps against applicable frameworks, Essential 8, ISO 27001, APRA CPS 234, Privacy Act, and any sector-specific obligations, with materiality ratings.
Accumulated debt across architecture, code, and process. Deferred remediation costs quantified and mapped against operational and strategic risk thresholds.
Every output is designed to move from assessment into governance. The findings are registered ready to be managed in a remediation process.
All findings captured with risk rating (critical / high / medium / low), business impact description, and recommended treatment. Formatted for presentation to board and executive leadership.
A sequenced plan that translates findings into remediation workstreams, with effort estimates, dependencies, and recommended timeframes across 30, 60, and 90-day horizons.
Every material finding has a named owner, an escalation path, and a review cycle. The matrix ensures nothing found in the assessment disappears into a gap between teams.
A concise, visual summary of assessment outcomes for C-suite and board audiences. Designed to communicate risk and recommended investment without requiring technical background.
Detailed supporting documentation for each of the eight assessed domains, providing technical teams with the evidence base and methodology behind every finding and rating.
Where clients require continued assurance, Bushey can remain engaged to track remediation progress, validate closure of findings, and provide periodic risk refresh assessments.
We don't produce a report and walk away. Every finding has a named owner and a governance path, before we leave the room.
Bushey leads the assessment with its own team. Findings aren't delegated back to the client to self-assess.
The accountability matrix assigns a name to every material risk before the engagement closes.
The assessment reflects what is actually there.
The remediation roadmap is designed to be governed. Bushey can remain engaged through to closure validation.
This solution operates within Bushey's proprietary delivery governance framework, AssureChange®. The five-stage model, from Alignment & Readiness through to Closure & Executive Assurance, provides the governance structure that converts assessment findings into managed, evidenced outcomes. Governance controls are technology-agnostic and apply uniformly across all engagement types.
AssureChange® is Bushey’s delivery and governance control framework used to manage and deliver transformation with clarity, control, and accountability from start to finish.
Unlike traditional frameworks that guide activity, AssureChange® provides structured control over decisions, risk, and accountability ensuring outcomes hold under real operating conditions.
No. AssureChange® is not a methodology, toolkit, or standalone service. It is the governance and delivery framework that underpins every Bushey engagement.
AssureChange® is applied across all transformation contexts including: Technology transformation programmes Data Centre and infrastructure change AI and cyber initiatives M&A technology integration engagements
It introduces: Stage-gated decision control Evidence-based progression Clear accountability ownership Continuous governance visibility This ensures projects move forward with control, rather than assumption.
AssureChange® governs three core areas: Decisions – made with evidence and clear authority Risk – identified early and actively managed Accountability – defined and owned throughout delivery
No. AssureChange® is applied consistently across all engagements, ensuring the same standard of governance and control regardless of project type or complexity.
It provides: Clear decision checkpoints Transparent reporting Evidence-based assurance Full visibility of risks and progress This allows leaders to stand confidently behind delivery outcomes.
No. It works across all delivery parties, providing a consistent governance model regardless of who is executing the work.
Organisations can expect: Controlled scope and execution Predictable, measurable outcomes Strong governance and accountability Stable transition into operations This enables transformation to be delivered with certainty, not risk.